Writing smart: Writing quality research papers
نویسنده
چکیده
The difficulty faced (by many) in reading a large fraction of the scientific literature is not, as is generally perceived, due to the complexity of scientific concepts, but is due to these difficult-to-read documents being poorly written. Scientific documents, however, need not be difficult to read, or even to write. In the rest of this article, we attempt to provide some insight into what goes into writing well. In doing so, we rely heavily on our own experience as authors, as reviewers, and as editors, on what we have, consciously or unconsciously, learnt from others (in particular from reading well-written papers, reviews, and replies to reviews), and on the considerable literature now available on scientific writing in print and on the Internet.
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of the Quality of Writing of the Title and Abstract of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Papers Published in the Journals of the Iran,s Universities of Medical Sciences in 2016, Based on the CONSORT Checklist: A Descriptive Study
Background and Objectives: Given the fact that randomized controlled clinical trials are more valid than other research methods to determine the therapeutic effects of treatment, proper design and accurate reporting is of particular importance. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the quality of writing the title and abstract of randomized clinical trials of Iranian medical unive...
متن کاملThe Nature and Structure of Ethical Papers
Nowadays, because of their innovative and scholarly nature, the scientific-research articles are taken into account as the best and sometimes the only judging criterion of their authors and scientific community. Therefore, all those who work in the academic fields and are working as A.M. and doctorate students or teachers are required to test their proficiency and to show that they are qualifie...
متن کاملWriting in natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process
In undergraduate natural science courses, two types of evaluators are commonly used to assess student writing: graduate-student teaching assistants (TAs) or peers. The current study examines how well these approaches to evaluation support student writing. These differences between the two possible evaluators are likely to affect multiple aspects of the writing process: first draft quality, amou...
متن کاملTips on Writing a Referee’s Report (Dicas para Escrever uma Avaliação de Artigo)
As research academics we spend a substantial amount of time reviewing papers for scholarly journals. While not as important as publishing our own research, the quality of our work as referees is important, both for our profession and for our success as scholars. This note presents some suggestions for writing good referee reports.
متن کاملThe Impact of Observer Ring Technique on the Writing Achievement: A case of Iranian EFL Learners
This study was conducted to probe the effect of the observer ring technique on the participants’ writing achievement. In so doing, the researchers utilized a quasi-experimental design with 20 participants in the control group and 18 in the experimental group. Instrumentation included a writing handout, an Oxford Placement Test (standard proficiency test), and a rating scale of writing. As a tre...
متن کامل